Subject: Why Star Wars is better than Star Trek (fwd)

From: "George J. Scheer" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 20:35:20 -0700 (PDT)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 12:21:21 -0700
From: LaiHan Szeto <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
    [email-masked]
Subject: Why Star Wars is better than Star Trek
---------------------- Forwarded by LaiHan Szeto/IWP on 07/25/97 12:11 PM
---------------------------
[email-masked] on 07/25/97 12:19:13 PM

Please respond to [email-masked]

To:   LaiHan Szeto/IWP
cc:
Subject:  Why Star Wars is better than Star Trek

Why Star Wars is Better than Star Trek
12. In the Star Wars universe, weapons are rarely,
if ever, set on 'stun'.

11.The enterprise needs a huge engine room with an
anti-matter unit and a crew of 20 just to go into
warp-- the Millenium Falcon does the same thing
with R2-D2 and a wookie.

10.After resisting the Imperial torture droid and
Darth Vader, Princess Leia still looked fresh and
desirable-- after pithy Cardassian starvation
torture, Picard looked like hell.

9.Jabba the Hutt would eat Harry Mudd for trying
to cut in on his action.

8.Luke Skywalker is not obsessed with sleeping
with every alien he encounters.

7.One word: lightsabers

6.The Federation would have to attempt to liberate
any ship named Slave I.

5.The Death Star doesn't care if the Earth is
class M or not.

4. Darth Vader could choke the entire Borg empire
with one glance.

3. Picard pilots through the Enterprise through an
asteroid belt at one-quarter inpulse power. Han
Solo floors it.

2. Aliens have make-up in other places than their
foreheads.

1. Death Star vs. Enterprise